{"id":261,"date":"2008-05-14T00:13:44","date_gmt":"2008-05-14T07:13:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/?p=261"},"modified":"2008-05-14T00:26:22","modified_gmt":"2008-05-14T07:26:22","slug":"marital-rating-scale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/2008\/05\/14\/marital-rating-scale\/","title":{"rendered":"Marital Rating Scale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Boing Boing just had a post on a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boingboing.net\/2008\/05\/13\/1939-marital-rating.html\">1939 marital rating scale for wives<\/a>.  The obvious question in a case like this is: how does <em>my<\/em> wife score on this <strong>scientific<\/strong> rating?<\/p>\n<p>Only one way to find out&hellip;  (Points up for grabs in square brackets.  Points given at end of commentary. )<\/p>\n<h3>Demerits<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li><em>Slow in coming to bed&mdash;delays till husband is almost asleep. [1]<\/em> Generally goes to bed before me.  Does that count?  Probably.  <strong>-1<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Doesn&#8217;t like children. [5]<\/em> She kind of does, but I don&#8217;t.  Again, the condition is pointing in the wrong direction.  I&#8217;ll take off partial points:  <strong>-2<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Fails to sew on buttons for darn socks. [1]<\/em>  Never.  <strong>-1<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Wears soiled or ragged dresses or aprons around the house. [1]<\/em> Two words: flower pants.  Taking extra points for those.  <strong>-2<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Wears red nail polish. [1]<\/em>  Nope.  <strong>-1<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Often late for appointments. [5]<\/em> &#8220;I&#8217;ll meet you in five minutes.&#8221;  Yeah right.  <strong>-5<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Seams in hose often crooked. [1]<\/em> Not applicable?  She does have that one pair of sweatpants that don&#8217;t sit right (because they were &#8220;cheap&#8221;).  I think that falls under number 4, though.  <strong>0<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Goes to bed with curlers on her hair or much face cream. [1]<\/em> There are a lot of creams, but not visible when going to bed.  <strong>0<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Puts her cold feet on husband at night to warm them. [1]<\/em> Oh god, how do feet get that cold?  Extra demerits:  <strong>-2<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Is a back seat driver. [1]<\/em> Only complains when I say things like &#8220;gonna die&#8221; while in the process of a dodgy left-hand turn. Reasonable since she&#8217;s the one exposed to oncoming traffic in that situation.  <strong>0<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Flirts with other men at parties or in restaurants. [5]<\/em> Any flirting likely negated by mine.  <strong>0<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Is suspicious and jealous. [5]<\/em> I will give her this one: I&#8217;m a tool, but she trusts me.  Giving a point back.  <strong>+1<\/strong>  [N.B. Her trust is well-deserved.]<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Merits<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li><em>A good hostess&mdash;even to unexpected guests. [1]<\/em> Yeah, she&#8217;s good like that.  It&#8217;s the Filipino side. When left alone in the house for extended periods, I can only offer unexpected guests delicacies such as filtered water and ketchup. <strong>+1<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Has meals on time. [1]<\/em> Not particularly.  Sometimes <em>I<\/em> even have to cook!  <strong>0<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Can carry on an interesting conversation. [1]<\/em> Often goes on about boring science stuff, but is generally interesting enough.  Tie goes to the runner:  <strong>+1<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Can play a musical instrument, as piano, violin, etc. [1]<\/em> Her mother bought her a piano, and <em>then<\/em> she decided she didn&#8217;t want to play.  For her mom: <strong>0<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Dresses for breakfast. [1]<\/em> Pffft.  <strong>0<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Neat housekeeper&mdash;tidy and clean. [1]<\/em> Better than me, but not particularly so.  <strong>0<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Personally puts children to bed. [1]<\/em> Not applicable.  I&#8217;ll give it to her:  <strong>+1<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Never goes to bed angry, always makes up first. [5]<\/em> We&#8217;re not big fighters.  Sure, why not?  <strong>+1<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Asks husband&#8217;s opinions regarding important decisions and purchases. [1]<\/em> Hrm. A real split decision here.  She often buys crap (and more crap) without telling me (or actively  hiding it from me).  These are rarely &#8220;important&#8221; purchases, though.  I&#8217;m nothing if not generous:  <strong>+1<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Good sense of humor&mdash;jolly and gay. [1]<\/em> I&#8217;ll leave &#8220;gay&#8221; alone.  She&#8217;s a funny one.  <strong>+1<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Religious&mdash;sends children to church or Sunday school and goes herself. [10]<\/em> Oh, you hate to see that many points slip through her fingers: <strong>0<\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><em>Lets husband sleep late on Sundays and holidays. [1]<\/em> I often wake up before her, but I suppose she <em>would<\/em> let me sleep in.  <strong>+1<\/strong> <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>If I&#8217;m doing the arithmetic right, that comes out to -6. Ouch.<\/p>\n<p>The brief article doesn&#8217;t provide any guidance on how I&#8217;m supposed to interpret the results.  You probably have to pay for that: that&#8217;s how they get you.  The negative number can&#8217;t be good, though.  [Edit: Oops&hellip; it&#8217;s in the original image.]<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m sure that if I really worked at the scores, I could get her up to zero.  Frankly, I&#8217;m too tired (and a little drunk) to do that now.  Too bad, because I am actually rather fond of her.<\/p>\n<p>[Kat: Please note that there&#8217;s an implicit demerit for beating your husband to death after assigning you a score on this scale.]<\/p>\n<p>Edit: Somebody posted <a href=\"http:\/\/flickr.com\/photos\/tiabla\/sets\/72157605047200616\/\">the full booklet on Flickr<\/a>.  On the analogous <a href=\"http:\/\/flickr.com\/photos\/tiabla\/2491839794\/in\/set-72157605047200616\/\">first page of the husband&#8217;s scale<\/a>, I&#8217;d say I come out perhaps slightly better.  Go me!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Boing Boing just had a post on a 1939 marital rating scale for wives. The obvious question in a case like this is: how does my wife score on this scientific rating? Only one way to find out&hellip; (Points up for grabs in square brackets. Points given at end of commentary. ) Demerits Slow in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-life","category-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=261"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gregbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}